OUR
AMERICAN
REVOLUTION
ANCESTORS
PRINT Version
of this article
National Society of the
Sons of the American Revolution
Back to
Lineage from
Col. Nicholas Lewis
Col. Nicholas
Lewis
m. Mary Walker
Jane Walker
Lewis
m. Hudson Martin
Mary Walker
Martin
m. Thurston Dickinson
Frances Elizabeth Dickinson
m. John Duggins
Elizabeth Marshall Duggins
m. James Henry Smith
Laura Ann Smith
m. Peter Christian Jensen
Lucile Marguerite Jensen
m. Wilhelm A. Heineman
Peter E. Heineman
m. Doris
J. Crum
Peter L.
Heineman
Lineage
from
Dr. Thomas Walker
Dr. Thomas
Walker
m. Mildred Meriwether
Mary Walker
m. Col. Nicholas Lewis
Jane Walker
Lewis
m. Hudson Martin
Mary Walker
Martin
m. Thurston Dickinson
Frances Elizabeth Dickinson
m. John Duggins
Elizabeth Marshall Duggins
m. James Henry Smith
Laura Ann Smith
m. Peter Christian Jensen
Lucile Marguerite Jensen
m. Wilhelm A. Heineman
Peter E. Heineman
m. Doris
J. Crum
Peter L.
Heineman
Lineage
from
Lt. Hudson Martin
Lt. Hudson
Martin
m. Jane Walker Lewis
Mary Walker
Martin
m. Thurston Dickinson
Frances Elizabeth Dickinson
m. John Duggins
Elizabeth Marshall Duggins
m. James Henry Smith
Laura Ann Smith
m. Peter Christian Jensen
Lucile Marguerite Jensen
m. Wilhelm A. Heineman
Peter E. Heineman
m. Doris
J. Crum
Peter L.
Heineman
Lineage
from
Pvt. William T. Duggins
William T. Duggins
m. Elizabeth Perkins
John Duggins
m. Frances E. Dickinson
Elizabeth Marshall Duggins
m. James Henry Smith
Laura Ann Smith
m. Peter Christian Jensen
Lucile Marguerite Jensen
m. Wilhelm A. Heineman
Peter E. Heineman
m. Doris
J. Crum
Peter L.
Heineman |
INTRODUCTION
The American Revolution
was a political movement during the last half of the 18th
century that resulted in the creation of a new nation in 1776,
the United States of America, and ended British control of the
Thirteen Colonies. In this period, the Colonies rebelled and
entered into the American Revolutionary War against the British
between 1775 and 1783, which culminated in an American
declaration of independence in 1776 and an allied victory. The
French government, army, and navy played critical roles in
aiding the newfound Americans financially and in providing
direct military and naval support.
The
Revolution involved a series of broad intellectual and social
shifts that occurred in the early American society, such as the
new republican ideals that took hold in the American population.
In some states sharp political debates broke out over the role
of democracy in government. The American shift to republicanism,
as well as the gradually expanding democracy, caused an upheaval
of the traditional social hierarchy, and created the ethic that
formed the core of American political values.
The
revolutionary era began in 1763, when Britain defeated France in
the French and Indian War and the military threat to the
colonies from France ended. Britain imposed a series of taxes
which the colonists thought were illegal. After protests in
Boston the British sent combat troops, the Americans trained
militiamen and fighting began in 1775. The climax of the
Revolution came in 1776, with the signing of the Declaration of
Independence. The end of the Revolutionary War is marked by the
Treaty of Paris in 1783, with the recognition of the United
States as an independent nation.
This publication is
not a retelling of the history of the American Revolution. It
is the biographies of four Revolutionary War ancestors; Col.
Nicholas Lewis, Lt. Hudson Martin, Dr. Thomas Walker, and Pvt.
William T. Duggins.
Col.
Nicholas Lewis
Nicholas Lewis Nicholas was born in
"Belvoir" Louisa Co., Virginia on January 19, 1734.
He was the second son of Col. Robert
Lewis of Belvior and Jane Meriwether. Robert was the third son
of Col. John Lewis and Elizabeth Warner. He was born at Warner
Hall, Gloucester County in 1702. He married Jane Meriwether in
1725. They had 11 children.
-
JOHN LEWIS, b. August 31, 1725, Of
Halifax, Virginia.; d. 1787, Caswell, N.C..
-
JANE LEWIS, b. January 01, 1726/27, New
Kent Co., Virginia.; d. Abt. 1794, Pittsylvania, Virginia..
-
COL. NICHOLAS LEWIS, b. January
19, 1734, "Belvoir" Louisa Co., Virginia., Virginia.; d.
December 08, 1808, "The Farm", Albemarle Co., Virginia..
-
COL.
WILLIAM LEWIS, b. Abt. 1730, Locust Hill, Albemarle Co.,
Virginia.; d. November 14, 1779, "Cloverfield, " Albemarle,
Virginia..
-
CHARLES LEWIS, b. 1730, of North Garden,
Louisa Co., Virginia.; d. 1779, Albemarle Co., Virginia..
-
MARY LEWIS, b. Abt. 1735, Albemarle Co.,
Virginia.; d. May 31, 1812, Albemarle Co., Virginia..
-
MILDRED LEWIS, b. September 01, 1737,
"Belvoir", Albemarle Co., Virginia.; d. Abt. 1825.
-
ROBERT LEWIS, b. 1738, Of Halifax,
Virginia.; d. 1780, Greenville Co., N. C..
-
ANN LEWIS, b. Abt. 1742, Of "Belvoir"
Albemarle, Virginia.; d. Abt. 1769, Spotsylvania, Virginia..
-
SARAH LEWIS, b. 1748, Albemarle,
Virginia..
-
ELIZABETH LEWIS, b. 1750, Hanover Co.,
Virginia.; d. 1833.
In 1735, Nicholas
Meriwether, Nicholas’ grandfather, obtained patents from King
George III to approximately 19,000 acres in Albemarle County
east of Charlottesville. One parcel of 1020 acres was located
west of the Rivanna River, the area which now is the Locust
Grove and Belmont neighborhoods. It became known as “The Farm”
because it was the one cleared area in a virgin forest. A
building on the property likely served as headquarters for
British Col. Banastre Tarleton briefly in June 1781. In
1825, Charlottesville lawyer and later University of
Virginia law professor, John A. G. Davis purchased a
portion of the original tract and engage Thomas
Jefferson’s workmen to design and build this house. It
is considered one of the best surviving examples of
Jeffersonian residential architecture. Maj. Gen. George
A. Custer occupied the house as his headquarters for a
brief time in March 1865.
|
|
A main house and
out buildings were built at “The Farm” on the hill facing the
river to the east. The house burned after a couple of decades.
Nicholas Lewis, grandson of Meriwether, inherited the property
in 1762 and built another main house facing the river around
1770. It was described as a place of beauty surrounded by a
garden of roses, shrubs and fine fruit. It could have been built
on or near the foundations for the first house. A listing in The
Mutual Assurance Society of Virginia records from 1805 may
describe the house. It was a wooden dwelling two stories high,
48 feet long and 22 feet wide.
|
The 1770
house was constructed of pitsawn with mortise-and-tenon
joinery. It is in this house the British Col. Banastre
Tarleton made his headquarters when he arrived in
Charlottesville in 1781 in his futile attempt to capture
Thomas Jefferson. Tarleton was successful in capturing
Daniel Boone, who at that time was a member of the
Virginia legislature, and held him captive in Lewis'
house. Thomas Jefferson himself often visited the Lewis
house and regularly rode through the property on his way
to Charlottesville to visit the university he was
building. There is an active spring down the hill a
couple of hundred yards to the south. |
In 1825, Charlottesville
lawyer and later University of Virginia law professor, John A.
G. Davis, purchased a portion of the original tract and engaged
Thomas Jefferson's workmen to design and build this house. It is
considered one of the best surviving examples of Jeffersonian
residential architecture. Maj. Gen. George A. Custer occupied
the house as his headquarters for a brief time in March 1865.
All that
remains of "The Farm" is the kitchen or cook’s house. It is now
in the middle of a middle class housing subdivision facing
Twelfth Street. It is still surrounded by mature hardwood trees
and retains its view of Monticello.
Family
Nicholas Lewis married Mary (Capt. Molly)
Walker in 1758. Mary was the daughter of Dr. Thomas Walker and
Mildred Thornton Meriwether of Castle Hill where Mary was born
in 1742. Nicholas and Mary had 15 children:
-
JANE WALKER LEWIS, b. 1757; d. 1838.
-
MILDRED WALKER LEWIS, b. 1761; d. 1814.
-
THOMAS WALKER LEWIS, b. April 24, 1763,
Locust Grove, Albemarle, Virginia.; d. June 09, 1807,
Albemarle, Virginia..
-
MARY LEWIS, b. 1765.
-
NICHOLAS MERIWETHER LEWIS, b. August 18,
1767; d. September 22, 1818.
-
ELIZABETH LEWIS, b. June 06, 1769,
Albemarle, Virginia.; d. March 1842, Cloverfields,
Albemarle, Virginia..
-
ELIZABETH LEWIS, b. June 06, 1769,
Albemarle, Virginia.; d. March 1842, Cloverfields,
Albemarle, Virginia.; m. WILLIAM DOUGLAS MERIWETHER,
February 29, 1788, Goochland Co., Virginia.; b. November 02,
1761, Cloverfields, Albemarle, Virginia.; d. January 21,
1845, Albemarle, Virginia..
-
ALICE THORNTON LEWIS, b. 1771; d. Young.
-
ROBERT WARNER LEWIS, b. 1774.
-
FRANCES T. LEWIS, b. 1776; d. Young.
-
JOHN P. LEWIS, b. 1778; d. Young.
-
CHARLES LEWIS, b. 1783; d. Young.
-
CHARLES LEWIS, b. 1783; d. Young.
-
MARGARET LEWIS, b. 1785, "The Farm",
Albemarle Co., Virginia..
-
MARGARET LEWIS, b. 1785, "The Farm",
Albemarle Co., Virginia.; m. CHARLES LEWIS THOMAS
Changing Times
July, 1775, saw the Governor of Virginia a fugitive and the
members of the Assembly met as a Provincial Convention to raise
and embody an armed force to defend the Province. The flight of
the Governor left the Colony without an executive head and the
Convention therefore appointed, on the sixteenth of August, a
Committee of Safety of eleven members to continue until its next
session.
It was to carry into
execution all ordinances and resolutions of the Convention, to
grant commissions to all provincial military officers, to
appoint commissaries, paymasters and contractors and to provide
for the troops. It was to issue warrants on the Treasurer to
supply these agents with money and pay them for their services
and to settle such incidental expenses as arose in connection
with the military establishment. All public war stores were to
be in its charge. The Committee, moreover, was made
Commander-in-Chief of the forces of the Province, and every
officer, to the highest, was obliged to swear obedience to it.
If sufficient danger
threatened the Colony before the troops which the Convention had
determined upon could be raised and organized, the Committee
might call upon the volunteer companies which had already sprung
up through the Colony, to take the field. Col.
Nicholas Lewis was a Member of the Committee of Safety
and Convention of 1775.
The Committee was
directed to keep a journal and lay the account of its
proceedings before the Convention for inspection. Its members
were exempt from enlistment and could hold no
military office. A complete break with the royal government was
insisted upon, since no member of the Committee might fill any
position of profit under the Crown. Fifteen shillings a day
(which a later Convention reduced to ten) was the compensation
allowed the members.
By other acts of this
Convention an appeal to the Committee of Safety was allowed any
officer from the decision of a court-martial, and no sentence of
death given in such a court could be executed until the
Committee of Safety had given its approval.
The Convention adjourned
till the first of December, leaving the Committee of Safety in
charge. At the beginning of the next session, the Committee was
continued, and on December 16th, a new one appointed of the same
size, to sit until the Convention’s next session. The same
powers that the former body had enjoyed were given it, and
others added. Any person found aiding the enemy was liable to be
seized and imprisoned, and his estates confiscated by the
Committee, unless the latter saw fit to pardon him. Three men
were appointed to act as a Court of Admiralty, and in all cases
where the ship and cargo were condemned appeal was allowed to
the Committee of Safety. It was, moreover, directed to
commission five members from each of the county committees to
have jurisdiction over all persons suspected of enmity to the
State. It was to hear appeals from their decisions and its
sentence was to be final. If a slave was taken in arms against
the Colony or in possession of the enemy through his own choice,
he could be sent by the Committee to any of the French or
Spanish West Indies to be exchanged for war stores. If
circumstances rendered his transportation inconvenient it could
employ him in any way for the public service. Those inhabitants
who refused to take up arms in the American cause, provided they
had committed no act of hostility or enmity, might leave the
Colony, under a license from the Committee of Safety.
The last Provincial
Convention, the body that framed the new constitution of
Virginia, came together in May, 1776. It revived the
Committee of Safety, whose term expired with its meeting, and
continued it until its own dissolution on July 5th.
Although the Assembly
under the constitution was not to convene until fall, the
Convention elected the Governor and Privy Council to take charge
of the State till then and usher in the new regime. The need for
the Committee of Safety therefore, was taken away, and it passed
out of existence with the Convention.
The functions of the
Virginia Committee were, in brief, to commission the officers,
to command the troops, to appoint agents to equip and feed them,
to pay the military expenses of the State, to imprison its
hostile inhabitants, to hear appeals from the Admiralty Court,
from the County Courts of Inquiry and from Courts Martial.
Its powers were
extensive, controlling the military, and to a large extent the
financial resources of the Colony, but during its administration
no danger threatened Virginia sufficient to test the stability
of its authority or its capacity to deal with a crisis. Its work
during the year in which it was the executive of the Colony,
consisted merely in organizing the militia, in providing it with
necessaries and in sending troops to retaliate upon the
irritating incursions of Lord Dunmore. The greater part of the
inhabitants were Whigs and the orders of the Committee were
fulfilled without friction. Virginia was not, like New Jersey or
Pennsylvania, the scene of a conquering army, and the problems
that their Committees had to face were not presented. Neither
was it at any time obliged to assume the whole authority of the
State. The Convention was in session during much of the year,
and directed the Committee in various ways. Even during its
adjournments it was still in existence and could always be
brought together if sufficient danger threatened. The Committee
of Virginia therefore occupied a less responsible position than
the Councils of Safety of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, or of
Vermont.
The Committee led a busy
if not a stirring life. The actual work of procuring arms,
accoutrements and provisions was largely in the care of
commissaries and contractors chosen by it, but they were under
the direction of the Committee and responsible to it, and every
disbursement that was necessary to satisfy the wants of the
troops, even the most minute, passed through its hands.
Conservative and radical
elements clashed in Virginia as in Pennsylvania. The
disagreement was not sufficient to overthrow the existing
regime, but centering, as it did, around prominent
personalities, brought with it sufficient bitterness. Patrick
Henry, the leader of the radicals, had been appointed
Commander-in-Chief of the Virginia army by the Convention. At
the head of the Committee of Safety was Edmund Pendleton one of
the foremost conservatives. It would seem that Henry was, as a
matter of fact, a better orator than general. At all events his
military capacity was distrusted to such an extent by the
Committee of Safety that Colonel Woodford, a subordinate, but
more experienced officer was detailed by it to command the
expedition against Lord Dunmore. Opportunity for military
achievement was rare in Virginia then and Henry felt the task
should have been his. He resented the fact that Woodford
reported directly to the Committee and not to him and finally,
when the Committee ordered Henry to prepare for winter quarters,
it seemed it was purposely refusing him any opportunity of an
engagement before the Virginia troops should be taken into the
Continental army, when he would be deprived of chief command.
Henry never forgot the treatment accorded him, nor did his
friends. When he resigned his commission in March, 1776, ready
tongues insinuated that the envy of the Committee had sought to
undermine his reputation and force him to the step. Supporters
of the government hastened to clear the Committee from blame.
The factional contest reappeared later in the contest over the
election of the President of the Virginia Convention,
and the question was discussed at large in the pages of the
Virginia Gazette.
Little judicial duty
fell to the Committee. As has been seen the first trial of
suspects rested with the judges appointed from the county
committees and commissioned by the Committee of Safety and cases
of appeal were only rarely brought before the latter.
The greater part of the
counties were well affected to the American cause but Princess
Anne and Norfolk contained many Tories who lent aid to Lord
Dunmore and gave intelligence of the plans of the Americans.
These districts were sometimes ravaged by parties from the
British fleet in search of provisions and the Committee of
Safety, at the suggestion of General Lee, determined upon the
extraordinary measure of removing the population of the two
counties into the interior to keep the friendly inhabitants from
harm, and to prevent the Tories from communicating with the
fleet. An order to this effect was issued April 10, 1776. All
inhabitants, whether friendly or hostile, that resided between
the shore and the American posts, were directed to remove at
once to the interior. To compel them to go, their live stock and
slaves were to be seized by the army and redelivered only when
they had complied with the order. All those in any part of the
two counties who had previously joined the British side or taken
oath to support it were to move at least thirty miles away from
the shore, and, to enforce submission, the slaves of all
suspected of belonging to this class were to be taken and to be
returned only at the order of the Committee, when the owners
were settled in some secure place. Three men were appointed to
superintend the matter and $1000 was to be advanced to them to
pay the expenses. All who were willing to provide dwellings for
the emigrants were requested to give notice in the Virginia
Gazette.
It is difficult to
justify a proceeding so arbitrary and so productive of needless
suffering. Its apologists have claimed that, though harsh, it
was rendered necessary by the danger of the time. This does not
seem probable, for Lord Dunmore had not shown himself able to
gain any ground in Virginia or to deal the Americans any
effective blow. The Committee may have feared the approach of
Howe’s fleet and army, but there was no certainty of their
coming. No serious danger threatened and it seems an
absurdity, in spite of the grave assertions of the Committee, to
depopulate the counties to protect them from marauding
expeditions and to prevent the Tories from furnishing the fleet
with supplies.
It was reasonably
certain that in leaving and losing their houses and land and
their business, in subjecting their live stock and slaves to the
uncertainty they must encounter before they were recovered and
in removing to a strange part of the Colony the inhabitants
would suffer more loss, discomfort and distress than it was
possible to receive from the enemy’s guns. As for the Tories it
would seem far less trouble to keep so vigilant a guard that
communication with the ships would be impossible than to attempt
the task of transporting them all into the interior. It is a
striking illustration of the despotic character of the
revolutionary governments and of the folly into which their
excessive fear of the British arms and their inexperience in
government led them.
Steps were soon taken to
enforce the order and Colonel Woodford was directed to take
general charge of the removal, and to deal with the people as
humanely as possible. Woodford complied and set about his task.
This high handed interference with persons and property aroused
inevitable opposition and a petition was sent to the Committee
from Princess Anne County setting forth the distress that would
ensue if the order was fully executed. It was therefore
reconsidered and modified to some extent. Six men were appointed
to find out those in the two counties who had taken active part
in behalf of the American cause, those who had remained quietly
neutral, and those who had appeared in opposition. The
commanding officer at Suffolk or vicinity was to allow the
friends and neutrals to remain unmolested, but to send into the
interior all live stock not necessary for their subsistence.
Those who had committed themselves against the cause were still
forced to remove with their families and effects.
The Convention met early
in May and the conditions were altered again. Besides the
Tories, the friendly inhabitants within certain sections were
ordered to leave because of the particular danger of their
situation. The rest were free to remain, unless the commander of
the neighboring troops, on urgent necessity, saw fit to remove
them. The expenses of the American sympathizers were to be paid
by the public, those of the disaffected from the sale of their
estates.
It was found, however,
that the people of the two counties were in distress for want of
food, and on May 16, a resolution was passed by the Convention
permitting the men of the Whig party to remain and care for
their crops, but obliging the removal of their families, slaves
and live stock. There was little probability of this order being
carried out. It took from the farmers the important service of
their cattle and slaves. It involved the separation of families
and placed the support of the women and children on the
government. Having conceded so much, it is not surprising to
find the convention a fortnight later rescinding the order for
removal entirely, as far as it related to friends.
The Tories were still compelled to leave.
In the absence of
evidence to the contrary it is reasonable to assume that the
orders against the Whigs may not have been rigidly enforced, and
that they may have suffered comparatively little. They were few
in number and the frequent issue of directions concerning them,
show that some at least must have remained in their homes
throughout. Between April 10 and May 3, the officers probably
waited to know the result of the petition. From May 3 to May 11,
when the first order of the Convention was passed the Whigs were
under the protection given by the Council. There remained then
only the time from the eleventh to the twenty-eighth when the
order was repealed, when they were in any considerable danger,
and during that period influence was probably busy to secure
delay, mitigation and at length the total repeal of the
obnoxious measure.
The Tories probably
suffered considerably. Lee writes from Suffolk, on April 23,
that he is busy clearing the country of them and an overseer of
the poor, in the county of Norfolk, speaks of the removal of a
great many of the inhabitants with their families and goods.
The confiscation of their estates made their departure
profitable to the government and it was therefore not likely to
be stopped.
The sufferings of the Tories
darken the pages of our revolutionary history. Men dreaded the
power of their numbers, their wealth and their influence, and
fear was quick to devise harsh measures. However successful its
work along other lines, the Virginia committee, in ordering the
removal of the Tories from Princess Anne and Norfolk Counties,
must stand condemned both for want of judgment and of humanity.
Military Career
Little is known of
Nicholas’ military career other than a brief note by Thomas
Jefferson dated August 18, 1813:
"Nicholas
Lewis, the second of his father's brothers, commanded a regiment
of militia in the successful expedition of 1776 against the
Cherokee Indians; who, seduced by the agents of the British
government to take up the hatchet against us, had committed
great havoc on our southern frontier, by murdering and scalping
helpless women and children, according to their cruel and
cowardly principles of warfare. The chastisement they then
received closed the history of their wars, and prepared them for
receiving the elements of civilization, which, zealously
inculcated by the present government of the United States, have
rendered them an industrious, peaceable, and happy people. This
member of the family of Lewises, whose bravery was so
successfully proved on this occasion, was endeared to all who
knew him by his inflexible probity, courteous disposition,
benevolent heart, and engaging modesty and manners. He was the
umpire of all the private differences of his country-selected
always by both parties. He was also the guardian of Meriwether
Lewis,...who had lost his father at an early age."
At the beginning of the
Revolution the Cherokee received a delegation from the Indians
north of the Ohio (Shawnee, Iroquois, Ottawa) to join them in a
war against the white settlements over the Blue Ridge. The
British offered guns, ammunition and cash payments for scalps
and sent officers among the Cherokee. Most of the Cherokee
declined this invitation and declared neutrality. However, the
Chickamauga faction, led by Tsi'-yu-gunsi-ni (Dragging Canoe)
did join in this war. Nancy Ward, the "beloved woman" of the
Cherokee sent runners to the settlements in northeast Tennessee
and Virginia's Clinch River valley warning of this attack.
Forewarned, the settlers at Watauga and Eaton's Station forted
up and beat off the attacks of 250-700 warriors in July of 1776
(estimates widely vary on the number of Chickamauga). Many of
the women and children in the Carter's Valley and Watauga
settlement left and temporarily found refuge in the New River
settlements.
In retaliation, militia
companies from southwest Virginia, western North Carolina and
the settlements in Tennessee gathered together and attacked the
Cherokee. The 1500 Virginians were led by Colonel William
Christian, they left for Cherokee lands in October of 1776,
returning in December, and then attacking again in April of
1777. They destroyed homes, livestock and crops of over 30
villages, both hostile and neutral. Most of the Cherokee fled
the villages before the militia arrived and put up little
resistance. According to Cherokee legend the inhabitants that
remained were slaughtered regardless of age and sex. On the
other hand, according to the reports of the militia officers and
later pension applications there were few killed on either side
and there is no mention that I have found of killing women and
children. Those women and children they found [and did not kill]
were according to official Virginia documents made prisoner and
Nancy Ward was brought back to Virginia (but was not considered
a prisoner according to official documents). However, there were
also attacks made on the Cherokee by the state militias of North
and South Carolina and Georgia and there are indications that
these men behaved in a less restrained fashion (e.g. 20 years
later in western Georgia Cherokee children still fled at the
sight of a white man). The Cherokee "made peace" (most had never
been at war).A peace
treaty was signed with the Carolinas and Georgia at DeWitt's
Corner on 20 May 1777 and with Virginia on 20 July 1777 at the
Long Island of the Holston. With the peace was a cession by the
Cherokee of over 5,000,000 acres of land.
Death
Col.Nicholas
Lewis died December 8, 1808 at 74 years of age. He is buried on
his property in a cemetery on a hilltop overlooking the river.
MaryWalker died February 9, 1824 at 81 years of age
Dr.
Thomas Walker
Thomas Walker
was born was born in Rye Field, King & Queens County,
Virginia January 15, 1715 the son of Maj. Thomas Walker and
Susannah Peachy. The Walkers of Virginia came from
Staffordshire, England about 1650 at an early period in the
history of the colony of Virginia. Major Walker was a member of
the Colonial Assembly 1662, being at that time a Representative
from the County of Gloucester. This gentleman, in 1663, claimed
that he planted 70,000 mulberry trees and therefore requested
bonuses for silk culture. In 1667 following the report of a
committee of the House of Burgess sent to count his trees, he
was awarded 20,000 pounds of tobacco for his efforts.
The
Explorer
Dr. Thomas Walker was one of the great explorers of southwestern
Virginia, crossing Cumberland Gap (what he called Cave Gap) on
April 17, 1750 and "discovering" Kentucky. He was not the first
person to cross the gap - Native Americans had lived in the area
for perhaps 10,000 years. As Walker recorded in his journal, he
was not even the first European to cross it and mark the
passage:
“April 13th.
We went four miles to large Creek which we called Cedar Creek
being a Branch of Bear-Grass, and from thence Six miles to Cave
Gap, the land being Levil. On the North side of the Gap is a
large Spring, which falls very fast, and just above the Spring
is a small Entrance to a Large Cave, which the spring runs
through, and there is a constant Stream of Cool air issueing
out. The Spring is sufficient to turn a Mill. Just at the Foot
of the Hill is a Laurel Thicket and the spring Water runs
through it. On the South side is a Plain Indian Road. on the top
of the Ridge are Laurel Trees marked with Crosses, others Blazed
and several Figures on them. As I went down the other Side, I
soon came to some Laurel in the head of the Branch. A Beech
stands on the left hand, on which I cut my name.”
Family
After studying medicine with his
sister's husband Dr. George Gilmer, Thomas set up practice in
Fredericksburg and became a noted physician. He also ran a
general store and engaged in an import and export trade.
In 1741 married Mildred
Thornton Meriwether. She was born March 19, 1721in Louisa,
Virginia, the daughter of Col. Francis Thornton and Alice
Savage. Mildredxe "Meriwether:Mildred Thornton (1721-1778)"
married twice, first to Nicholas Meriwether III and then to Dr.
Thomas Walkerxe "Walker:Dr. Thomas (1715-1794)". Thomas Walker
and Mildred Meriwether had 12 children:
-
MILDRED WALKER, b. Castle Hill, Albemarle
County, VA.
-
MARY (Capt. Molly) WALKER,xe "Walker:Mary
(Capt. Molly) (1742-1824)" b. 1742.
-
COL. JOHN WALKER, b. Castle Hill,
Albemarle County, VA 1743, d. 1809 in Madison's Mill, Orange
County, VA
-
SUSAN WALKER, b. Castle Hill, Albemarle
County, VA 1746, d. Albemarle County, VA.
-
DR. THOMAS WALKER JR., b. Castle Hill,
Albemarle County VA 1748.
-
LUCY WALKER, b. Castle Hill, Albemarle
County, VA 1751.
-
ELIZABETH WALKER, b. Castle Hill,
Albemarle County, VA 1753.
-
SARAH WALKER, b. Castle Hill, Albemarle
County, VA 1758.
-
MARTHA WALKER, b. Castle Hill, Albemarle
County, VA 1760.
-
REUBEN WALKER, b. Castle Hill, Albemarle
County, VA 1762, d. 1765.
-
HON. FRANCIS WALKER, b. Castle Hill,
Albemarle County, VA 1764, d. 1806.
-
PEACHY WALKER, b. Castle
Hill, Albemarle County VA 1767.
Castle Hill
By marriage,
Thomas Walker acquired 11,000 acre estate known as Castle Hill.
|
The
original wooden structure was completed in 1765 and
faced the mountains to the northwest. Walker would
reside at Castle Hill until his death on November 9,
1794. Walker's son Francis would succeed to the Castle
Hill estate, after his father made him power of attorney
until his death in 1806. Judith Rives (1802-1880),
granddaughter of Thomas Walker, who married the Hon.
William C. Rives a senator, lived at Castle Hill for the
duration of her life. Today the home has been added on
to and remodeled many times, but the original structure
still
stands. Walker would continue
to acquire land throughout his life. For example in
1772, Lord Dunmore gave Walker another land grant of 226
acres within Albemarle County. |
Castle Hill also
played host for a short time to the British enemy Banastre
Tarleton on June 4, 1781 during the midst of the American
Revolution. There Tarleton made a short stay, but was delayed by
the insisting of Mildred Walker. This delay gave the young Jack
Jouett of Louisa County enough time to reach Charlottesville and
send a messenger to warn Thomas Jefferson and her legislators
staying at Monticello, who escaped just in time safely into
Staunton, Va. in the Shenandoah Valley. Tarleton's short visit
at Castle Hill proved to be a critical moment in the Revolution
by saving members of the General Assembly and giving the
citizens of Charlottesville time to prepare or flee.
Castle Hill also
played host to many Native American chieftains who would stop at
Walker's home on their journeys to Williamsburg. Walker used
these opportunities to learn about practices and psychology of
different tribes, and to gain information about the consistency
of wildlife and woodlore in the unknown west.
1749-1777
In 1749 Thomas became chief agent of Loyal
Land Company, which had received a grant of 800,000 acres from
the council of Virginia and in the following years he led an
expedition to explore lands of this grant. He kept a journal of
the trip which was the first record of a white man in what was
to become Kentucky. In 1775, during the French and Indian Wars,
he became Commissary to Virginia troops under George Washington
and was later charged with fraud, but acquitted. A copy of his
journal can be viewed at:
http://www.tngenweb.org/tnland/squabble/walker.html
Dr. Thomas Walker served on the
Committee of Safety in Virginia. In 1777 he was appointed with
his son Col. John Walker to visit Indians in Pittsburgh, Pa. for
the purpose of gaining their friendship for the Americans.
The Walker Line
In 1776 the Virginia House of
Delegates defined the northern boundary of the Kentucky District
as the low-water mark at the mouth of the Big Sandy, on the
northern shore of the Ohio River. This boundary followed the Big
Sandy River from that point to the junction of the Tug Fork, and
from there up to the Laurel Ridge of the Cumberland Mountain to
the point where it crossed the Virginia-North Carolina line
(known as "seven pines and two black oaks). When Virginia agreed
to separate Kentucky in the Compact of 1789, that description
was accepted.
In 1779-80, The
Virginia-North Carolina dividing line was extended westward to
the first crossing of the Cumberland River. From this point west
to the Mississippi, Thomas Walker surveyed the line for
Virginia. This took him through dense forests, over rugged
mountains - a most difficult task. According to R. S. Cottrill,
in an article dated 1921, this line almost immediately caused a
tremendous amount of dispute for many years between Kentucky and
Tennessee. When Kentucky became a state in 1792, it immediately
began to "find fault" with the line as drawn by Thomas Walker in
1779.
Before 1779 the line
between Virginia and North Carolina was run at 36 30' degrees
toward the Cumberland Gap. This is commonly known as the 36-30
line. In 1779, Dr Thomas Walker and Daniel Smith were chosen by
Virginia to extend the line to the Tennessee River. Their party
included Col Richard Henderson and William B Smith of North
Carolina. The men ran into tremendous obstacles and disputes
almost immediately when they decided to run two separate lines
to the Cumberland Gap. Henderson refused to proceed and the
Walker party continued and by the time they reached the
Cumberland River, they found themselves several miles too far
north. The Walker party then continued to run their line only to
the Tennessee River but on to the Mississippi River.
In 1799, in an effort to solve
the boundary problem, the Virginia House of Delegates created a
commission comprised of John Coburn, Robert Johnson and Buckner
Thruston. They met with the Virginia delegation of Archibald
Stewart, Gen Joseph Martin and Creed Taylor. They began their
survey at the forks of the Big Sandy and followed east along the
Tug Fork to the Breaks of Sandy. They then went northeast from
the Walker line at the spot known as the seven pines and two
black oaks, went up the watershed of the Cumberland Mountain to
the crossing of the Russell Fork of the Levisa Fork - and thence
along a magnetic line 45 degrees east longitude to the crossing
of the Tug Fork.
That same year, 1799, a joint commission settled Kentucky's
eastern and northeastern boundaries, the rest of the boundaries
were not handled. Westward from the ridge top of the Cumberland
Mountain, the boundary between Virginia and North Carolina
(later, 1796, Tennessee) remained questionable because of the
Walker Survey of 1779.
In 1801, the Kentucky
Legislature appointed commissioners to ascertain and mark her
southern boundary. This did not occur for some reason until 1812
- in fact five times the Legislature took up this problem. Over
ten times in a ten-year period (1820-1830), the Kentucky
legislature tackled the problem, still feeling that Kentucky had
been cheated out of its own land - and finally commissioners
were appointed to represent Kentucky and Tennessee to settle the
problem.
Crittenden represented
Tennessee and Rowan represented Kentucky. Felix Grundy and W J
Brown were to assist in looking out for the interests of
Tennessee. They met in January of 1820 in Frankfort and decided
to communicate by writing. The Tennessee commissioners stood by
the old Walker line and refused to consider any other line. They
felt they had the right to it as their citizens had settled in
this area and they were Tennesseans and would not become
Kentuckians! Crittenden urged Rowan to give up the idea and let
the line stand, but John Rowan was determined and stubborn and
refused to take any line other than what is known as the 36-30
line along the entire boundary. Thus, nothing was accomplished.
In 1821, the
commissioners from both states were back to work and started
running the line again as if there had been no problems in the
past. Kentucky appointed William Steele and Munsey to represent
them and Absalom Looney represented Tennessee. They ran the line
again, they thought, on the 36-30 line and marked it extremely
carefully to the Cumberland River. But it was found later that
they had really started at 36-34 and ended at 36-37 but was a
little more accurate that the original Thomas Walker drawn line.
On the first of May 1821 they began on the Cumberland Mountain
and on July 2nd, they concluded it at the crossing of the
Cumberland River and joined the original Walker line - just
above John Kerr's house. The Tennessee representatives approved
the survey but the line westward was uncertain until a 1859
survey by Austin P Cox and Benjamin Pebbles.
That did not settle the
dispute. By 1825 the Kentucky Legislature is again questioning
the boundary and so the state hired a mathematician to relocate
the line. Thomas Matthews was appointed to handle this task and
was paid over $2,000 for his services. Beginning with his
findings, the boundary question shifted from the east to the
west of the Cumberland River. It seems that when Walker ran the
original line, the western part of Kentucky still belonged to
the Chickasaw Indians and Walker stopped at the Tennessee River.
Kentucky had later purchased this land and its boundaries had to
be fixed. More disputes arose between Tennessee and Kentucky
over the next few years and many times, the representatives from
each state were deadlocked. The land around Reelfoot Hills and
the southern boundary of Trigg County, KY was the most difficult
to establish and it often seemed a total impossibility to
determine the line.
With the battle still raging,
in 1845 the Kentucky Legislature again named commissioners to
run the boundary. Wilson and Duncan were named along with a
representative from Tennessee and they attempted to mark the
boundary of Christian, Trigg and Fulton Counties. The noted
Joseph Rogers Underwood of Barren and Warren County was named to
this commission but resigned.
The difficulties continued madly into the
1850's. In 1858 the Kentucky Legislature authorized the Governor
of Kentucky to again name commissioners to once and for all
determine the boundary lines. Austin P Cox and Charles M Briggs
met with two Tennessee commissioners (Peoples and Watkins) the
next year and made a successful attempt to find and locate the
entire line. They ran a resurvey east of the Cumberland and
corrected the former lines west of that river.
In 1859, the Cox-Pebbles
team traveled a 320 mile course between January 9th and October
20th. It covered the same terrain that Walker's party had
traveled from New Madrid Bend to the Cumberland Gap. They
erected 3 foot high stone slabs every five miles to mark the
line - beginning at Compromise on the Mississippi River and
ending at the spot where the old Wilderness Road passed through
the Cumberland Gap.
In today's age of technology,
satellite mapping and precision surveying, it is hard to realize
what difficulties all these men through the years encountered in
trying to map out and determine the boundary lines. But, you
might ask - what was gained by all these many years of
struggling, fighting and legislature sessions? Kentucky gained
the 36-30 line for its boundary only west of the Tennessee River
and east of that river, the line is basically what it was as
marked by Walker in 1799. It has been rumored down through the
pages of time, that there was a lot of "wheeling and dealing"
under the surface also. Farmers who possibly bribed the
surveyors by a little moonshine to let their land lie in
Kentucky or Tennessee (Moonshine was legal in Tennessee during
many of these years and illegal in Kentucky).
Death
|
Dr. Thomas Walker
died
November 9, 1794 at Castle Hill, Albemarle County
Virginia, at 79 years of age. Mildred died November 16,
1778 at Castle Hill, Albemarle County, VA, at 57 years
of age. They are buried on the estate. The cemetery is
situated near the foot of the mountain in the woods
surrounded by a brick wall. |
Lt. Hudson Martin
Hudson Martin
was born in Saline
County, Missouri July 3, 1752. He enlisted as an ensign under
Capt. James Alexander on March 11, 1776 and was promoted to
Lieutenant on March 26, 1776. Lt. Martin was wagon master at
Lancaster, Pa. in 1778 but resigned in April of the same year.
He was appointed by Gov. Patrick Henry, Paymaster to the
Regiment of Guards, commanded by Col. Francis Taylor from
January 1779 to August 1781, at which time the regiment was
disbanded. They were stationed at Albemarle to guard the
prisoners captured October 1777, at the surrender of Gen.
Burgoyne, at Saratoga. According to his pension papers, Hudson
Martin was drafted in Fluvanna County, as a militiaman in 1781
when he took the place of his brother William.
Family
Hudson Martin married Jane Walker
Lewis in Saline County, Missouri, December 2, 1778. Jane was
the daughter of Col. Nicholas Lewis and Mary Walker mentioned
earlier. The family settled southwest of Charlottesville,
Virginia in the counties of Albemarle and Nelson, near Rockfish
Gap & River. They had nine children:
-
NICHOLAS LEWIS MARTIN, b. 1779, d. 1787.
-
HUDSON MARTIN II, b. 1781.
-
JOHN MASSIE MARTIN, b. 1783, d. 1851.
-
MARY (Molley) WALKER MARTIN, b. 1787.
-
JANE LEWIS MARTIN, b. 1790.
-
NICHOLAS LEWIS (2nd) MARTIN, b. 1791.
-
HENRY BUCK MARTIN, b. 1794, d. 1828.
-
GEORGE WASHINGTON MARTIN, b. 1796.
-
MILDRED HORMSLEY MARTIN, b.
1801.
Death
Hudson Martin
died November 28, 1830 in Fayette County, Maryland, at 78 years
of age. His will was executed June 23, 1828, and is on record
in Nelson Co. Va., and a copy of it is on file in the Pension
Office at Washington, D.C. Judging from the bequests of real
estate, slaves and money to the several members of his family,
he was a man of considerable wealth and influence in the county
in which he resided. The executors to his estate gave bonds to
the amount of 20,000 pounds. Jane Walker Lewis died August 15,
1838 in Albermarle County, Virginia, at 81 years of age.
Pvt. William T. Duggins
William was born in Dublin, Ireland
October 31, 1751. William was an only child. After his
father’s (William) death he came with his mother, Alice, to
Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania Co, Virginia in 1763. She
afterwards married Robert Wilkinson, by whom she had three
children, and then died in Fredericksburg. William was
apprenticed to a silversmith in Louisa County, Virginia.
Service
He enlisted
January 20, 1777 in Capt. William Vanse's Co. 12th Va. Regiment
to serve during the Revolutionary War. He was transferred about
June 1778 to Col. James Woods' Co., 4th, 8th & 12th Va.
Regiments, and about October 1778 to Capt. William Vanse's Co.
8th. Va. Regiment, commanded by Col. James Woods. His name last
appears on the Co. muster roll for November 1779, dated at camp
near Morristown December 9, 1779 without special remark relative
to his service.
Family
William married Elizabeth Perkins
December 16, 1787, daughter of William Perkins, of a well-known
South Carolina family of that name. He was a member of the
Episcopal Church, and a devout Christian. Elizabeth was born in
South Carolina, in 1771. William and Elizabeth had 14 children:
-
POLLY DUGGINS, b. 1788, Louisa County
Virginia.
-
JANE DUGGINS, b. 1790, Louisa County
Virginia.
-
ROBERT DUGGINS, b. 1792, Louisa County
Virginia; d. bef. 1872, Virginia.
-
WILLIAM DUGGINS,JRxe "Duggins:William
(1794-dec.)", b. 1794, Louisa County, Virginia; d. Hanover
Co., Virginia.
-
JOHN D. DUGGINS, b. 1796, Louisa County,
Virginia; d. 1865, Saline County, Missouri.
-
GEORGE DUGGINS, b. 1798, Louisa County,
Virginia; d. aft. 1873.
-
POUNCY DUGGINS, b. 1800, Louisa County,
Virginia.
-
JEFFERSON DUGGINS, b. 1802, Louisa
County, Virginia; d. bef. 1873, Virginia.
-
WASHINGTON DUGGINS, b. 1804, Louisa
County, Virginia.
-
JAMES MADISON DUGGINS, b. 1806, Louisa
County, Virginia; d. 1865, Virginia.
-
LEWIS H. DUGGINS, b. 1808, Louisa County,
Virginia; d. 1875.
-
THOMAS CRUTCHFIELD DUGGINS, b. 1810,
Louisa County, Virginia; d. 1880 Marshall, Missouri.
-
FLEMING P. DUGGINS, b. 1812, Louisa
County, Virginia.
-
FRANKLIN A. DUGGINS, b. 1814, Louisa
County, Virginia.
Death
William T.
Duggins died June 23, 1827 in Louisa County, Virginia, at 75
years of age. Elizabeth Perkins died December 17, 1823 in Louisa
County, VA at 52 years of age.
|