PRINT Version
of the article
Back to
|
Traditional rank amongst
European royalty, peers, and nobility is rooted in Late
Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Although they vary over time and
between geographic regions (for example, one region's prince
might be equal to another's grand duke), the following is a
reasonably comprehensive list that provides information on both
general ranks and specific differences.
Sovereigns and Sovereignty
"Sovereign" (in the European sense) is a technical term, both
noun and adjective. In times past, a sovereign was sovereign,
i.e., answerable only to God for his actions. Only the Pope is
sovereign in this sense today (as head of the Vatican City
State), with Princes Rainier of Monaco and Hans-Adam of
Liechtenstein coming a relatively close second. More generally,
a sovereign is any hereditary head-of-state, whatever the title,
and whatever constitutional powers the sovereign may have. For
the purposes of this document, "sovereign" refers to a ruling
head of state and need not be royal or imperial.
Luxembourg is headed by a grand duke; Liechtenstein and Monaco
are headed by princes. Liechtenstein and Luxembourg are both
sovereign states and their heads of state are sovereigns. While
Prince Rainier of Monaco is a sovereign, in strict terms Monaco
is not a sovereign state, its semi-dependent relationship to
France governed by treaty. Andorra is similarly not strictly a
sovereign state. The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man are not
part of the United Kingdom but feudal dependencies of the
British Crown and also lack sovereignty, as do Britain's various
colonial leftovers.
Before
the unifications of Germany and Italy, there were a welter of
sovereign or essentially sovereign states ruled by
variously-titled sovereigns -- electors (in German, "Kurfürst"),
margraves, etc. The families ruling these formerly independent
states are for the most part still dynastically significant
today.
Nobles and Nobility
Romans recognized three orders: patricians, equestrians and
plebeians, and earlier, before the foundation of the republic, a
fourth: royalty. Added to this, there was the concept of
nobilis; to be noble meant you were descended from
someone who had been Consul; being a patrician was necessary to
become Consul (though you could buy your way in), but to be
noble was ineffably grander, at least to the Roman way of
thinking. This has been turned around a bit in Italy; in Italian
cities today, a "patriciate" exists which is considered to be
above "mere" nobility.
These
notions of the Romans apply to present-day parlance. In the
British system, one can discriminate between royalty, nobility,
knights, gentry and commons: five grades. The Germans tend to
regard certain of what the British regard as gentry as noble,
and at the highest levels, what the British define as noble
resembles what the Germans regard as "princely" and in general,
continental systems as a whole tend to have a broader definition
of "noble".
In
essence, the nobility were the landowners. To be a landowner you
had to be prepared to defend your right to own
that land, and with the progressive disorders that lead to the
fall of the Western Roman Empire and the development of the
feudal system in Europe, nobility became synonymous with the
military caste -- an essentially self-appointed caste.
In the
West, it is nearly impossible to trace any noble lineage back
much before AD 800 (though the old Gaelic nobility of Ireland
has a special claim to antiquity here); anything before 1100 is
remarkable. The organized system of titles we have today is a
rather late development, but "count", and "prince" go back to
the Roman Empire. Only when it was recognized that one might
have "betters" (i.e., with the organization of nation-states)
did the nobles start paying attention to titles, styles, and
pedigrees.
A
distinction needs to be made between "nobility" and "peerage".
In the British system, a peer is the holder of the title, while
a noble is a member of a family headed by a peer. In the UK,
such family members, while "noble", are still technically
common, which is not necessarily the case elsewhere. More
narrowly, a peer also sits in parliament, as with the British
House of Lords or the former French House of Peers. There are
some titles in the United Kingdom (e.g., the Irish peerage, when
the peer lacks another English, Scots or UK title) which do not
permit one to sit in the House of Lords; thus, in Scotland, the
distinction of a "Lord of Parliament".
Something also needs to be said about "title inflation". While
the British system is tidily exclusive, this is not the case in
other systems. As explained below, some systems (as with France)
have long tolerated "courtesy titles", a putative title of
nobility that has no basis in fact. In other cases, all the
descendants of a noble have a title, the title holder, as in
Italy, being styled "Duke of Suchandsuch", with everyone else
being titled "Firstname of the Dukes (or Marquesses, etc) of
Suchandsuch".
François Velde writes about the French situation:
Nowadays, anyone descended from a count uses the style of count
(although "le comte Pierre de X" is distinguished from "Pierre,
comte de X" who is the real title-holder). That makes it seem
like many counts. Since there are only about 1000 authentic
titles, the share of titles/peerages to population is similar to
England.
In
Germany, since the Weimar Republic, all titles are considered
part of one's last name. Thus, a real title holder can "adopt"
an adult, and the otherwise unrelated person then can become
"Joe Schmuck Duke of Saxony" (this is the case of ZsaZsa's
hubby); the practice is alluded to in Billy Wilder's film,
One Two Three (Cagney's last film before Ragtime).
Then
there is the matter of how the nobility of a previous state was
incorporated into that of a successor state or regime. This
particularly applies to Germany as well as Italy, but also
applies to the case of the United Kingdom (with the Scots and
Irish peerages) and in France, how titles granted after the
ancien regime are handled. The term "mediatization" is often
applied here.
On
occasion, all of this becomes very involved, a topic hotly (and
voluminously) debated. Outside the British system, the reader is
cautioned about taking any title at immediate face
value, as a thousand years of history, succeeding states,
differing usages, vast quantities of personal vanity, as well as
not a little fraud may be involved; it is not without good
reason that Dumas, Trollope, et al. had fun casting faux Italian
nobles as charming (or not-so-charming) villains. Even in
Britain, the recent practice of peddling lordships of the manor
(feudal leftovers so devoid of meaning that Parliament has never
seen fit to abolish them) testifies to the problems
Imperial Titles
Latin |
Imperator, Imperatrix |
Greek |
Autokrator |
English |
Emperor, Empress |
German |
Kaiser, Kaiserin |
French |
Empereur, Imperatrice |
Spanish |
Emperador, Emperatriz |
Russian |
Tsar, Tsarina |
"Emperor" comes from the Latin imperator, roughly
"commander", a title which ancient Roman armies "spontaneously"
hailed a victorious general by; this entitled the general to a
triumph (a sort of ancient Tournament of Roses Parade and Bowl
Game). It was one of the titles of the Roman Emperor.
Diocletian divided the Roman Empire into East and West, with two
emperors, each emperor being "Imperator" and "Augustus". Each
co-emperor had associates, termed "caesars". This system proved
unworkable, but the division of the Empire was permanent by
about AD 395.
The
fall of the Western Empire is traditionally dated to August 23,
476 when Odoacer was crowned King of Italy. Romulus II, or
alternately, Julius II Nepos, is considered the last Western
Emperor.
"Caesar", as a title of the Roman Emperor, or an associate of an
emperor, entered both German and Russian as the word for
"emperor" (respectively, "kaiser" and "tsar"); the Bulgarian
word "tsar" is usually translated to "king". In English and the
western Romance languages, "imperator" was the word that won
out.
The
Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire continued up to 1453, when
Constantinople fell to the forces of the Ottoman Turks under
Mehmet II. The last Byzantine Emperor was Constantine XI. It has
been said that as Rome began and ended with a Romulus, so
Constantinople began and ended with a Constantine.
On
Christmas Day, AD 800, Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne Roman
Emperor, i.e., Western Emperor. The Eastern Emperor (by now, the
Byzantine Emperor) acceded to this. This is the start of the
Holy Roman Empire, which would continue for a thousand years,
until 1806. This was the first "thousand-year reich".
"Charlemagne" is Old French for "Charles-le-magne" or "Charles
the Great". In German, he referred to as "Karl der Große". In
Latin, this is Carolus Magnus. He is counted as King Charles I
of France and as Holy Roman Emperor Charles (or Karl) I.
Napoleon I was vested with "the imperial dignity" by a law of
the French Senate in May 1804. A referendum approved the
hereditary character of that dignity in his family. He abdicated
in April 1814, returned for a brief interlude (the 100 Days) in
March-June 1815 and abdicated again. (--François Velde)
The
son of Napoleon I by Marie-Louise of Austria is counted as
Napoleon II. He is usually treated in historic and encyclopedic
works under his Austrian title, Duke of Reichstadt.
Emperor Napoleon III was the first Napoleon's nephew.
Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte, president of the French Republic,
instigated a coup on Dec. 2, 1851 and had himself proclaimed
Emperor in 1852; he abdicated in 1870 consequent to France's
defeat in the Franco-Prussian War. The 1852-70 period is called
the Second Empire. (--(mostly) François Velde)
In
1804, Holy Roman Emperor Francis II assumed the title of
Austrian Emperor as Francis I (in German, Franz). On August 6,
1806, he disclaimed the title of Holy Roman Emperor, which is as
good a date as any to mark the decease of Holy Roman Empire. The
use of the numeral was a decision on the part of Franz himself.
Emperors of Austria
Franz I ( Francis I) |
1806-1835 |
Ferdinand |
1835-1848 |
Franz
Josef (Francis Joseph) |
1848-1916 |
Karl (Charles) |
1916-1918 |
Dr.
Otto von Habsburg is the present head of the House of
Habsburg-Lorraine; he is the son of Emperor Karl and
Empress-Consort Zita. The headship of Habsburg-Lorraine may pass
to the Archduke Lorenz of Austria-Este, the husband of Princess
Astrid of Belgium (who is anticipated to eventually become
queen-regnant, as her brother, Crown Prince Phillippe, seems
disinclined to marry); if this happens, the head of the House of
Habsburg-Lorraine may again wear a crown, in the person of (the
probable) future King Amedeo of Belgium.
In
1871, at the end of the Franco-Prussian War, the King of Prussia
was proclaimed German Emperor (Deutscher Kaiser) at
Versailles. Considering the number of ruling or reigning kings,
grand dukes, margraves, etc, to be found in the now-unified
Germany, the assumption of the imperial title was not
unreasonable. It also symbolized the emergence of Germany as a
world power. This was "the second reich".
German
Emperors
Wilhelm I |
1871-1888 |
Friedrich |
1888 |
Wilhelm II |
1888-1918 |
Kaiser
Friedrich was also King Friedrich III of Prussia; Prussia is
wholly defunct as a state since the Potsdam Conference following
World War II. The present head of the (imperial) House of
Hohenzollern is Prince Georg Friedrich (born 1976); he is the
great-great-grandson of Wilhelm II through his father and
grandfather, both of whom were named Louis Ferdinand, and his
great-grandfather, Crown Prince Wilhelm. There are Hohenzollerns
in the legitimate male line senior in descent to Georg
Friedrich, but they have been denied succession rights due to
unequal marriages.
The
Russian monarchy was different from those in the West. The
Russians considered themselves a kind of "New Rome" after the
fall of Byzantium to the Turks. Until the reforms of
Tsar Peter I
("the Great"), the word "tsar" was used exclusively; thereafter,
he decreed "emperor" was to be the term used when translating
"tsar" into other European languages. For the francophile, often
francophone Russian aristocracy, the equivalence of "tsar" and
"emperor" became complete. Notwithstanding this, the Russian
monarchy, the Russian Church and much of Russian society was
originally based on the Byzantine model, something evident even
today. Note that the Russian tsars called themselves
"autocrats", after the Byzantine term for emperor, "autokrator".
There
is some controversy about who represents the authentic Romanov
heir, but Maria Vladimirovna, the daughter of Grand Duke
Vladimir Kyrillovich (first cousin of Tsar Nicholas II), and her
son, George Romanov, seem to have the strongest claim. A tsarist
restoration in Russia seems unlikely, but some sort of
"official" status may develop, analogous to the status held in
France by the Count of Paris as the most broadly recognized
claimant to the French throne.
The
Brazilian emperors were offshoots of the Portuguese royal
family. Emperor Pedro I is also counted as King Pedro IV of
Portugal. Brazil became independent in 1822 with Pedro as
Emperor. He abdicated in 1831. Pedro II was deposed in 1889 by a
military coup. There are two pretenders to this throne,
descended from Princess-Imperial Isabel, heiress of
Dom Pedro II.
Relatively recently, the Brazilian people were asked if they
wanted a restoration as a "crowned presidency". This may yet
happen; in Brazil, anything is possible.
Mexico
has had two emperors. The first was Augustin Iturbide; he
crowned himself a la Napoleon in 1822, abdicated in 1823, and
was executed in 1824. Mexico's more famous emperor was the
ill-fated Maximilian, younger brother of Franz Josef of Austria.
He and his consort, Carlota (the daughter of King Leopold I of
Belgium and a first cousin of Queen Victoria), were crowned in
1864. In 1867, Maximilian's position became untenable when
French troops provided by Napoleon III were withdrawn. Instead
of fleeing, he held out to the last and was captured by the
forces of Benito Juarez. Despite international pleas, Juarez had
him executed by firing squad June, 9, 1867 (Maximilian is the
one wearing a sombrero in Manet's famous painting of this
event).
In the
United Kingdom, the Assumption of Titles Act (1877) granted to
Queen Victoria the title Empress of India. This was mostly a
reaction to the "inflation" of imperial titles (Germany, Brazil,
Austria, Russia), but was also a recognition that the British
Raj had supplanted the old Mogul dynasty. King George VI and his
wife, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother (mother of the present
British sovereign) were the last Emperor and Empress-Consort of
India.
Ruling Titles
Kings and Queens
Latin |
Rex, Regina |
Greek |
Basileus |
English |
King, Queen |
German |
König, Königin |
French |
Roi, Reine |
Spanish |
Rey, Reina |
Portuguese |
Rei, Reiha |
Romanian |
Regele, Raina |
Bulgarian |
Tsar |
Norwegian |
Konge, Dronning |
Danish |
Konge, Dronning |
Swedish |
Konung, Drotning |
Dutch |
Koning, Koningin |
Irish |
Ri, Rigan (High-King = Ard Ri) |
In
modern terms, a king or queen-regnant is the hereditary head of
a nation-state. In Europe today, there are only seven such
monarchies. These are:
Nation |
Sovereign, Consort; Heir-Apparent |
Belgium |
King
Albert II, Queen Paola; Crown Prince Philippe |
Denmark |
Queen
Margrethe II, Prince Henrik; Crown Prince
Frederik |
Netherlands |
Queen
Beatrix, Prince Claus; Crown Prince
Willem-Alexander |
Norway |
King
Harald V, Queen Sonja; Crown Prince Haakon
Magnus |
Spain |
King Juan Carlos, Queen Sophia; Felipe, Prince of
Asturias |
Sweden |
King
Carl XVI Gustaf, Queen Silvia; Crown Princess
Victoria |
United
Kingdom |
Queen
Elizabeth II, Philip, Duke of Edinburgh;
Charles, Prince of Wales |
More
distantly in time, there were other kingdoms and dynasties.
Bohemia was once a kingdom. There was an elective monarchy in
Poland, but this became extinct when Poland was partitioned
between Prussia, Russia and Austria. Burgundy was absorbed into
France, but had an illustrious history. In Spain, Navarre and
Castille were just two of the kingdoms that united to form the
state we know today. The "kingdoms" of the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland are two formerly separate
kingdoms, England (joined with the Principality of Wales) and
Scotland,
plus a rump of a third former kingdom, Ireland. What is now
Italy has a very jumbled history, but there were kingdoms to be
found there too, among them, the old Norman Kingdom of Sicily,
the Kingdom of Sardinia (which lead to the modern Italian
state), and the curiously-named
Kingdom of the
Two Sicilies. We might also mention the old
Crusader-founded Kingdom of Jerusalem.
Other Ruling Monarchies
Three current European monarchies are headed by persons lacking
the title of "king" or "queen". These are:
Nation |
Sovereign, Consort, Heir-Apparent |
Liechtenstein (principality) |
Prince
Hans-Adam II, Princess Marie; Hereditary
Prince Alois |
Luxembourg (grand duchy) |
Grand
Duke Jean, Grand Duchess Josephine-Charlotte;
Hereditary Grand Duke Henri |
Monaco (principality) |
Prince Rainier III, [none]; Hereditary Prince Albert |
The
use of "Hereditary Prince" or "Hereditary Grand Duke" is
discussed under under "Imperial, Royal, and Noble Offspring".
In
earlier times, there were many more monarchies of this kind,
variously titled as grand duchies, duchies, principalities, etc.
Most of these occurred within the bounds of the former Holy
Roman Empire, or in regions adjacent to it, though in Italy, the
Grand Duchy of Tuscany (Florence) of the Medicis (and later, as
a branch of the Habsburgs) needs mentioning. Finland was a grand
duchy held by the Romanovs. The brief-lived Grand Duchy of
Warsaw was created by Napoleon I. Some discussion of the history
of the Holy Roman Empire is necessary before many of these
titles originating from it can be adequately understood. We
might mention here that Luxembourg was created as a grand duchy
for the House of Orange-Nassau within the German
Confederation (successor of the Holy Roman Empire), while the
Netherlands (including present Belgium) remained outside of the
Confederation (and previously, the Empire).
The Pope
Since
the signing of the Lateran treaty, the Pope has been Sovereign
of the Vatican City State. Before the States of the Church were
incorporated into the Kingdom of Italy, the Pope was similarly a
territorial sovereign (this was the central part of Italy from
Rome north). Almost all nations of the world recognize the
Vatican as a sovereign nation-state, albeit a peculiar one, and
maintain diplomatic relations with it -- including the United
States.
The Holy Roman Empire and the German System.
Holy Roman Emperor was an elective office. However, dynastic
politics made it effectively hereditary, first with the
Hohenstaufen, then, except for a brief period, the Habsburgs.
For the Habsburgs, an imperial election was still necessary for
an emperor to enter into his reign, and this was done by the
Electors (in German, Kurfürst, Kurfürstin). The number of
electors grew over time; at the dissolution of the empire these
were:
Temporal |
Spiritual |
Brandenburg |
Cologne |
Bavaria |
Mainz |
Bohemia |
Trier |
Hanover |
|
Hesse |
|
Palatinate |
|
Saxony |
|
The
power of the Holy Roman Emperor was limited and the nobles who
putatively owed him allegiance were oftentimes sovereign in all
but name, particularly in the latter stages of the Empire.
Some
of these magnates held lands outside the Empire as kings;
the Elector of Brandenburg (as King in Prussia, then with
Frederick the Great and his successors as King of
Prussia) and the Elector of Hanover (Kings George I through
George III of the United Kingdom) are two such cases.
Within
the Empire, these powerful families ruled as electors, grand
dukes, dukes, margraves, landgraves, and princes. With the
extinction of the Holy Roman Empire, kingdoms emerged out of the
former Imperial domains, each headed by its own royal house:
Bavaria
Hanover
Saxony
Prussia (additional lands within the old Empire)
Württemberg
The
Austrian Habsburgs, accustomed to being imperial, assumed the
title of Emperor of Austria in 1804. Later, the "dual-monarchy"
was established, with the Habsburgs as Emperors of Austria and
Kings of Hungary, the combined realm being known as
"Austria-Hungary".
The
other magnates often became entirely independent grand dukes,
etc., usually retaining their old titles, but sometimes assuming
(on occasion, unilaterally) a grander one. Some of these titles
and styles are only approximately equivalent to those
encountered in European nations outside the borders of the
former Empire. All of this was settled at the Congress of
Vienna, and the British equivalencies are determined by starting
(but not ending) with the protocols hammered out there; part of
this was a process referred to as "mediatizing".
Mediatization is very important in the German system. It refers
to formerly ruling houses who maintained their dynastic rights
even when they lost sovereignty over territory. It meant that
even if they no longer ruled, they were still "equal" in
dynastic dignity to the luckier families that did retain
sovereignty over lands and would remain equal provided their
members married equally.
The
word "ebenbürtigkeit", "equal-birth-ness" is often found in this
context, and seems to be naturalizing itself into English with
the sense of "equal marriage", as an antonym for "morganatic"
(unequal marriage). An unequal, or morganatic marriage meant
(and still often does mean) that any child of such a marriage
will be denied succession rights and will have a lesser status
than that of an ebenbürtigkeit cousin.
The
word "mediatize" refers to the "immediate" person the magnate
owed allegiance to; originally this was the Emperor, but after
1815, many of the smaller magnates were placed under the
authority of one of the new entirely sovereign states in what is
now Germany.
Incorrectly or not, this term, (mediatization) has also been
applied to other no-longer reigning or ruling houses which were
never part of the Holy Roman Empire, e.g., the Kingdom of the
Two Sicilies which was consolidated with the Kingdom of Italy or
to the ancient royal and noble houses of Armenia and Georgia in
their relationship to the Russian throne.
What
should be kept in mind here is that formerly ruling or reigning
houses (royal or not) are carefully distinguished from
(formerly) non-ruling or non-reigning houses in the German
system, with the former taking precedence before the latter --
whatever the actual title may be. Of similar but lesser
importance is the distinction between "old" and "new" (post-1800
creation) nobility. If all of this makes the Germans seem
insufferable snobs, you're not far off track.
Outside of the Empire, each nation-state evolved its own system
and nomenclature. For the most part, the different systems are
parallel, but there are important distinctions and exceptions
that one should be aware of, particularly when distinguishing
non-royal but otherwise formerly sovereign houses from those
which are merely noble.
Imperial, Royal, and Noble Offspring
Some titles were reserved exclusively for an imperial or royal
child. Othertimes, the child was given an otherwise noble title.
The heir of a noble often bears a distinctive style as well.
In
English, a prince is the child (and in the male line, a
grandchild) of the king or queen-regnant (and in the direct line
of succession, the great-grandchildren of the sovereign), and
are styled a "royal highness". This nomenclature applies to the
children of continental kings and queens-regnant, at least when
speaking English.
What
distinguishes a style from a title here is unclear. "Dauphin"
for the French heir or "Prince of Wales" for the British, while
a title, is really more of a style. The same can be said for
"Prince [or Princess] of Asturias" for the Spanish heir, but "infante"
for a Spanish prince of the blood seems closer to a title as we
have been using the term; one may say the same thing about the
Habsburg use of "Erzherzog". Title and style for imperial and
royal offspring varies from dynasty-to-dynasty. What might be
thought of in English as being a non-royal title may in fact be
a very royal title in another place.
Most
people are aware of the distinction between a royal prince, as
with the United Kingdom, and a ruling prince, as with Monaco or
Liechtenstein, but are probably confused about who takes
precedence over who (a ruling prince usually takes
precedence; this is all governed by international protocol). The
potential for confusion is also present with grand dukes, as a
ruling grand duke would normally outrank the child of a Russian
tsar.
The
child of a Habsburg emperor was referred to as an archduke or
archduchess (Erzherzog or Erzherzogin), a style used by the
Habsburgs as far back as the 14th century. It extended to his
grandchildren in the direct line of succession.
Absent
another specific term, the English term for the heir-apparent to
an imperial throne was "Prince [or Princess] Imperial", as with
Napoleon III's son, Prince-Imperial Eugene, or the heiress of
Dom Pedro II of Brazil, Princess-Imperial Isabel, which in fact
was also the form in French and Portuguese.
The
German system often makes use of the prefix "Erb" for the heir
to a title as with "Erbgraf" whereas the British system prefers
using a lesser "courtesy title". William Addams Reitwiesner
writes:
"Erb"
in German (in this sense) means "hereditary"[.
. . .] The oldest son and heir of a Mediatized Count would be
an "Erbgraf". The oldest son and heir of a Grand Duke would be
an "Erbgroßherzog". And so on. Another way of spelling the title
would be "Erb-Prinz" or "Erb-Graf", etc. The wives of these men
have equivalent feminine titles, such as"Erbprinzessin", "Erbgräfin",
"Erbgroßherzogin", etc. The French form is "prince heredetaire",
"comte heredetaire" "grand-duc heredetaire", etc. (toss in
accents as appropriate).
In
French usage, Prince Albert of Monaco, as heir to Prince
Rainier, is a "prince-heredetaire", and Prince Alois, the heir
of Hans-Adam of Liechtenstein is, in German usage, an "Erbprinz".
"Hereditary Prince" and "Hereditary Grand Duke" sound alien in
English, but this is how they must be translated.
This
German usage, however, does not extend to royalty; for the
Germans, Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden is a "Kronprinzessin"
and Prince Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands is a "Kronprinz".
The
heir to a French ducal title is sometimes styled "Prince of
Suchandsuch", but this is more a "courtesy title" (see François
Velde's comments under "Prince"), and roughly corresponds to the
British practice of the heir to a peerage using a lesser title
held by the actual peer, as with the marquessate of Blandford
for the
Dukes of
Marlborough.
In the
Russian system, "grand duke" is the English term for the son of
a tsar, a translation for "velikiy knyaz" (which might be better
translated as "great [or grand] prince"). For a grand duchess,
the Russian term is "velikiy knyazhna" if unmarried, "velikiy
knyagina" if married. This is a title that was used by the Grand
Dukes of Muscovy. In German, this is termed Großfürst or
Großfürstin (vs. "Großherzog" = Grand Duke). This is considered
equivalent to archduke or archduchess, but needs to be
distinguished from sovereign grand dukes (as with
Luxembourg). Generically, the son of a Russian tsar was termed a
"tsarevich", a daughter "tsarovna". "Tsesarevich" or "cesarevich"
has been stated to be a title reserved for the eldest son of the
tsar.
The
son of a Spanish king or queen-regnant is termed an infante, a
daughter an infanta, in distinction to "principe" or "princesa".
The king or queen-regnant's heir, however, is always styled
Prince or Princess of Asturias (Principe de Asturias). A
Princess of Asturias can be "demoted" to mere infanta by the
advent of a baby brother; the wife of the Prince of Asturias,
however, is styled the Princess of Asturias.
Prince and Fürst, Grand Duke, Margrave, Count-Palatine, and
Landgrave
Prince and Fürst
Latin |
Princeps |
English |
Prince, Princess |
French |
Prince, Princesse |
German |
Prinz, Prinzessin; Fürst, Fürstin |
Italian |
Principe, Principessa |
Spanish |
Principe, Princesa |
Portuguese |
Principe, Princeza |
Russian |
Knyaz, Knyazhna |
"Prince" has a long history. When the Emperor Augustus accepted
the title from the Roman Senate, it meant "first among equals",
as in "primus inter pares". It remained one of the titles of the
Roman Emperor. The English word "principal" retains some of this
meaning. In German, the idea has been translated into the title
"Fürst".
In the
most general terms, when not referring to the children of a
king, "prince" refers to a sovereign or semi-sovereign
individual who has direct personal rule over a relatively small
territory, as with Monaco and Liechtenstein today.
Because the Germans were much more used to minor princes than
were other European states outside the Empire, and because
German has the additional title of "Fürst", "Prinz" in German
does not have the very royal cachet it does in English, and
sometimes may be classed as a lesser title than "Herzog", or "Großherzog"
depending on a particular title's history.
"Fürst"
is a uniquely German title that is best translated to "prince"
and should be regarded as superior to "prince". It designates
the head (the "first") of a princely house, or the head of a
branch (or "cadet") of such a house. For example, the German
form of Prince Rainier's title is "Fürst von Monaco" (Princess
Grace was "Fürstin").
Electors of the Holy Roman Empire were termed "Kurfürst,
Kurfürstin". "Großfürst" is the word used in German for a
Russian grand duke (son of a tsar).
From
these examples, we can see that in the German system (and
elsewhere in continental systems), a prince is sometimes
something more than a mere noble, but not necessarily royal and
it is this distinction that makes comparing it with the British
system difficult.
In the
Russian system, "knyaz" (translated as "prince", e.g., Prince
Potemkin) is the highest degree of nobility, and sometimes,
represents a mediatization of an older native dynasty (e.g., the
Bagratians) which became subject to the Russian imperial
dynasty; it was "also used by Rurikid branches, and before the
Romanovs they WERE the Russian imperial dynasty." (--Louis
Epstein)
"Prince" is also the term used to translate the highest level of
the old Gaelic nobility (see under "count").
Napoleon created princes during the First Empire, and I am told,
at least one survives to the present day. François Velde
comments on the usage of "prince" during the ancien regime:
France, in theory, had no sovereign princes within its
boundaries like Germany had, so the rank of prince was reserved
for the royal family (as in England) and there was no title of
prince. However, when one looks at 10th or 11th c. charters, one
sees the word
princeps used synonymously with baronis, optimus,
etc to designate nobles and lords. The usage disappeared in most
places, with a few exceptions, where the lord of some little
village was, by custom, called "prince of". In the 16th c. and
17th c. some of these lordships passed into ducal families, who
then took the habit of bestowing that "princely" title on the
eldest son of the current duke.
Grand Duke
English |
Grand Duke, Grand Duchess |
German |
Großherzog, Großherzogin |
French |
Grand Duc, Grande Duchesse |
Italian |
Gran-duca, Gran-duchesa |
As has
been explained in earlier sections, this is a ruling (or
formerly ruling) title unless it refers to the children of a
Russian tsar. A sovereign grand duke or grand duchess was often
a royal highness (as with Luxembourg). In German usage, you will
also encounter the style of "Grand-Ducal Highness".
It is
difficult to decide if a Grand Duke outranks a Prince or Fürst.
One has to know the history of the title.
For a
discussion of the distinction between a dukedom and a duchy, see
under "duke" below.
Margrave
"Margrave" and "margravine" are the English words for "Markgraf"
and "Markgräfin". As a title, it is etymologically equivalent to
a Marquess (see below), but as there were ruling margraves in
what is now Germany, such a Markgraf was superior.
Count-Palatine
"Palatine" refers to extraordinary powers granted to a noble.
The English word "palatine" means a region under the authority
of a noble where the king's writ was suspended. While the noble
owed allegience to the king (or Holy Roman Emperor), the holder
of a palatine had absolute authority, including the right to
grant titles of nobility, create knights, raise armies, coin
money -- i.e., powers normally reserved to a sovereign. There
were palatinates in British history, in both England and in
Ireland, and could be given to either lords temporal or
spiritual. There was a case of a "bishop-palatine"; Louis
Epstein reports "the English Lords Bishop of Durham used to rule
a 'county palatine'".
"The
Palatinate", however, refers to the Rhineland Palatinate in
Germany, or in German, "Rheinland-Pfalz" (as with the state in
the modern Federal Republic of Germany). There was also the
"Upper Palatinate", or "Oberpfalz".
The
Counts-Palatine of the Rhineland Palatinate (in German, "Pfalzgraf,
Pfalzgräfin"), were one of the premier noble houses of the Holy
Roman Empire, and were electors, i.e., the Elector-Palatine.
Landgrave
As with "margravine", "landgrave" and "landgravine" are another
pair of German titles that have achieved their own regular word
in English. It corresponds roughly to a count or earl, but in
the case of Hesse-Homburg, it was a ruling title. The German
words are Landgraf and Landgräfin. See "Earl, Count, and Graf",
below.
Nobility
Dukes
Latin |
Dux |
English |
Duke, Duchess |
German |
Herzog, Herzogin |
French |
Duc, Duchesse |
Italian |
Duca, Duchesa |
Spanish |
Duque, Duquesa |
Portuguese |
Duque, Duqueza |
Related Terms:
duchy,
dukedom, ducal.
The
Latin dux was a military title that might roughly
translate to "field marshal". The historical kernel of in the
stories of King Arthur probably refers to a dux bellorum
in charge of the forces holding off the barbarian onslaught in
early post-Roman Britain.
The
English kings introduced the French ducal structure into the
British system, and it was initially a mostly royal title (as
all new creations during this century have been). In France
especially after 1600, however, as well as in Britain, it has
evolved into a mostly non-royal title.
The
idea that a duke is a royal title, however, is strong in
Germany, perhaps stronger than it ever was in Britain, where all
the children of the head of some ruling houses are automatically
a Herzog or Herzogin, much as imperial offspring were archdukes
or archduchesses.
A
duchy (or grand duchy) is the territory ruled by a duke (or
grand duke) or the lands (and/or incomes) specifically attached
to the ducal title. A dukedom is the title itself. In the UK,
there are properly only two duchies, those of Lancaster and
Cornwall; these are essentially corporations holding properties
that provide income for the Queen (who is "Duke" of Lancaster),
and the Prince of Wales (who is also the Duke of Cornwall); as
only these two dukedoms carry such special "attachments" with
the title, duchies are thus a royal preserve.
"Duke"
is normally a very exalted title; however, when equating the
dignity of some dukes, some insight is needed. For example,
Ferdinand of the Two Sicilies created dukes in Naples almost by
the gross, and these titles cannot be considered equal to dukes
in the British or other continental systems.
Marquess
English |
Marquess, Marchioness |
German |
Markgraf, Markgräfin (in English, Margrave, Margravine) |
French |
Marquis, Marquise |
Italian |
Marchese, Marchesa |
Spanish |
Marqués, Marquesa |
Portuguese |
Marquez, Marqueza |
Related Terms:
marquessate, margravate.
This
title glosses to "march lord", i.e. a noble in charge of the
marches (the border regions) of a realm in distinction to other
lords in more-settled lands. These were essentially warlords
with broad powers and in this context, may be thought of as a
"palatine" title. In earlier times, it was a rare title; it was
later revived as a grade between count and duke.
Jeff
Leader writes that
"How
the King Became His Majesty, by L.G. Pine, [...] says
margrave (Latin: marchio or margravius, Dutch:
marckgrave) occurs first in the dispositions of Charlemagne."
As a
senior title (about two-thirds of British dukes are also
marquesses), it is not that common the United Kingdom, at least
when compared to other countries (especially France where "petit
marquis" was a term of derision).
In
Germany, margraves were ruling, heading there own little states
and today are still accounted as formerly ruling houses (see the
separate heading).
Earl, Count, and Graf
Latin |
Comes, Comitissa |
English |
Earl, Countess |
German |
Graf, Gräfin; Landgraf, Landgräfin (In English,
Landgrave, Landgravine);
Pfalzgraf, Pfalzgräfin (In English, Count-Palatine,
Countess-Palatine) |
French |
Comte, Comtesse |
Italian |
Conte, Contessa |
Spanish |
Conde, Condesa |
Portuguese |
Conde, Condeza |
Swedish |
Greve, Grevinde |
Danish |
Greve Grevinde |
Dutch |
Graaf, Graafin |
Irish |
Ard Tiarna, Bantiarna |
Hungarian |
Groef, Groefin |
Related Terms:
earldom, comital, countly.
"Earl"
is related to Old Norse "jarl", and is equivalent to "count",
which itself comes from the Latin comes. This in turn is
related to the English word "county", which pretty much explains
what a count was: the principal figure of the county. In Roman
times, the comes was a courtier, an Imperial official, and
actually outranked a dux (duke).
William I of England regarded the Anglo-Saxon "earl" as a
synonym for "count", and while this was not correct, it was a
practical equivalency. Old English lacked a feminine and thus
the French term was adopted for an earl's wife as well as for
women who hold earldoms in their own right.
The
German word "graf" seems etymologically related to the English
"reeve", which comes from the Old English "gerefe". A reeve is
an important appointed official, as with the "shire reeve",
i.e., the "sheriff". What English divides among several words,
German uses a single word with prefixes, and generally it has a
broader meaning than English "earl" or "count". "Graf", then,
should not be understood as being perfectly equal to "earl" or
"count", but as also containing the idea of "reeve", or
"important official". In German lands, offices normally thought
of as being appointive and held by commoners in Great Britain
could be hereditary and noble. The House of Thurn and Taxis, for
example, started out life as the Imperial postmasters, a job one
would not think of in Britain as ennobling.
Some
will maintain that a British earl outranks any continental
count. Compared to some other systems, especially those that
incorporated the results of the often slapdash practices of
older systems (e.g., Italy), there are proportionally fewer
British earls than counts.
In
France and Italy, the title holder is "Firstname, the Count of
/title/", while his family members are, roughly, "Firstname, of
the Count of /title/". This makes countly (and other titles)
seem far more common than in the UK. With "count", "title
inflation" is particularly notable.
François Velde, speaking of title inflation, says:
Since
the late 18th century (even before the Revolution) petty nobles
started using titles which were never theirs. No one bothered to
rebuke them publicly, and these became known as "titres de
courtoisie". These totally invented titles multiplied in the
19th c.
Landgraf/landgrave (along with Pfalzgraf/Count-Palatine) is
inserted here with un-prefixed graf mostly because the
distinction is difficult to make outside of German. The title is
equivalent neither to marquess nor viscount. A Landgraf was
lower than Herzog or Markgraf, but definitely above a Graf in
the pecking order. When a sovereign title, (as it was in one
instance), it would outrank even a (non-ruling) duke or prince.
Regarding the status of the Irish titles provided here (and
under "Baron"), Patrick O'Shea writes:
"Ard
Tiarna" ("High Lord") and "Tiarna" ("Lord"), respectively in
literal translation; the titles properly belonged only to the
male holders, and the female titles were courtesy titles only ("Bantiarna"
literally means "wife of a Lord"). Women could not, and still
cannot, hold Gaelic feudal titles in their own right. There are
no equivalent titles for other grades of nobility, as the Gaelic
feudal system had fewer levels of heirarchy than the continental
or Anglo-Norman systems. In fact, many Irish Lords of great
rank, which could appropriately be styled "Ard Tiarna," prefer
the simpler style of "Tiarna."
These
titles are distinct from those created by the English Crown in
Ireland (though some have the same geographical names), which
naturally follow the English system. The Kingdom of Desmond lost
its independence in 1596, but the titles have been retained as
'incorporeal property' as is the case with the many recognized
titles granted by other non-regnant Royal Houses.
Viscount
English |
Viscount, Viscountess |
French |
Vicomte, Vicomtesse |
Italian |
Visconte, Viscontessa |
Spanish |
Vizconde, Vizcondesa |
Portuguese |
Vizconde, Vizcondeza |
Related Terms:
viscountcy or viscounty.
This
title is mostly confined to the United Kingdom and France,
though it appears rarely in Italy and elsewhere.
This
is the leftover title, what the king bestowed on someone who was
not important enough to merit being made a count. It's a rather
late innovation. It originated in France, as the count's deputy,
i.e, the "vice-count".
Baron
English |
Baron, Baroness |
German |
Baron, Baronin; Freiherr, Freifrau |
French |
Baron, Baronne |
Italian |
Barone, Baronessa |
Spanish |
Baron, Baronesa |
Portugese |
Baron, Baroneza |
Irish |
Tiarna, Bantiarna |
Related Terms:
barony, baronial, baronage.
Barons
were originally (in Britain) those who held their lands directly
from the king. Not all British nobles have baronies and many
viscounts, for example, do not. (--Louis Epstein) The majority
of the nobility in Britain are just plain barons. In the UK,
life peers are always barons or baronesses (as with Baroness
Thatcher).
Once,
a baron was an important noble, especially before the
Renaissance. It was the barons who brought King John to heel at
Runnymede, and "robber-baron" has entered English as the term
for one of the lords who collected "tolls" from Rhine
river-traffic. In olden times, when there was little
differentiation in degree or rank between neighboring nobles,
"baron" could signify any noble, large or small, a meaning with
some currency today on the continent, roughly equivalent in
meaning to "peer" or "lord" in the UK.
The
terms "Baron, Baronin", can be found in use in German lands, but
apparently not that commonly. Freiherr and Freifrau are
preferred, and there seems to be a perception that "Baron" is
bit under a "Freiherr". "Freiherrin" seems to be an obsolete
form for a baron's wife. D.A. Willis comments:
Freifrau is a wife of Freiherr, Freiin is his daughter. I used
to think that Freiin was an abbreviation of Freiherrin, but I
was quickly corrected by several Freiherren and Freiinen (plural
of Freiin). This is the only case in German that I am aware of
where the wife and daughter have different words for their
titles.
The
status of barons varies. It can be a very high title or
something of little consequence. It is definitely a noble title,
however, and needs to be clearly distinguished from "baronet".
Baronet
Related Terms:
baronetcy, baronetage.
This
may be thought of as a hereditary knighthood. For convenience,
it may also be thought of as a noble title, though there are
those who would disagree, at least as used in the British
system. A baronet is certainly not a peer; in the United
Kingdom, baronets are not entitled to a seat in the House of
Lords (unless, of course, they additionally hold a peerage). Guy
Stair Sainty writes: "In Germany the rank of knight was
hereditary, but it was always viewed differently from knighthood
earned."
The
German "Ritter", when part of a last name, indicates the German
equivalent of a baronetcy. A woman holding a baronetcy in her
own right is termed a baronetess.
When
one picks through lesser German titles, such things as "Waldgraf",
Rheingraf", "Burggraf" and the such pop up. On the whole, these
seem obsolete, yet, there are a few families who cling to them;
they are also encountered on title-lists of otherwise far more
exalted personages. The German system was more flexible when it
came to titles; as has been demonstrated, it was also broader in
its definition of nobility. Since we have been using the British
system to classify titles, these are placed here at the end,
somewhere between-and-after the British sense of
Baronet-as-a-knight and Baronet-as-petty-noble.
|